Does the framework ask FIs to formalize an E&S or ESG policy?

Does the framework encourage FIs to go beyond E&S requirements of local laws and regulations?

Does the framework ask FIs to set E&S objectives and targets?

Does the framework ask FIs to publicly disclose their E&S policy and its governance?

Does the framework require FIs to carry out appropriate E&S due diligence at transaction level?

Does the framework require FIs to carry out appropriate E&S due diligence at client level?

Does the framework encourage FIs to categorize projects/clients according to their level of E&S risk?

For high-risk transactions, does the framework encourage site visits to be organized?

In case of negative E&S impacts, does the framework invite FIs to engage with clients to implement mitigation measures?

Does the framework ask FIs to incorporate E&S covenants and investment conditions into legal agreements with clients?

Does the framework ask FIs to develop processes to manage E&S risks during supervision?

Does the framework encourage a periodic review of E&S risks at aggregate portfolio level?

Does the framework ask FIs to develop and maintain E&S capacity through regular training?

Does the framework highlight the training of (i) front office staff, (ii) second lines of defense (risk officers and/or compliance officers), and (iii) E&S experts?

Does the policy require FIs to establish and maintain an inquiry/complaints/grievance mechanism in relation to E&S or ESG practices?

Does the policy require FIs to report regularly on E&S or ESG performance, including publicly, to investors or to regulators?

Does the policy make E&S or ESG reporting and disclosure more consistent across financial institutions through principles, guidelines, or templates?